Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, having an 81.3 score against 80. The LG V35 ThinQ design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Zoom, even though it was released about 15 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom features better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom has a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much more MP camera in the back and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.