Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Although Motorola razr (2020) is way newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) captures better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.