Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 537 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 81.3 score against 79.2. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.