Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a a bit thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Nokia 9 PureView, even though they were released with only 9 months difference. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a screen that is very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's screen, both of them have the same 1440 x 2880 resolution, a display with the same size and a greater pixels count in each inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in LG V35 ThinQ, both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a back camera with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution.
The Nokia 9 PureView's battery duration is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.