Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Nokia XR20, getting an 81.3 score against 80.8. Although LG V35 ThinQ is a lot older than Nokia XR20, it's construction is noticeably thinner and much lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Nokia XR20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with higher video frame rate, a camera with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 has a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.