Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 81.3 against 75.8. LG V35 ThinQ is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's noticeably thinner and way lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ has more memory to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.