Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but LG made it notably lighter and way thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S and LG V35 ThinQ both have quite similar CPUs, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better video definition, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.