Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having an 81.3 score against 79.7. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Find X2, it's construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. OPPO Find X2 has a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 shoots better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, faster video frame rates and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X2 has longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.