Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is a little thinner and just a little lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ and the OPPO Find X2 Neo feature quite similar displays, because although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery size. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.