Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's incredibly heavier and thicker. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a slightly better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a little bit larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more MP camera in the back.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro has improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.