Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is just a little thinner and lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ and the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G have incredibly similar displays, because although the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.