Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Galaxy A13 5G's body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Galaxy A13 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A13 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.