Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G, getting a general score of 81.3 against 77.4. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is much older than Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher display density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A15 5G features a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.