Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A16 5G, with an 81.3 score against 76.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 16 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
Galaxy A16 5G features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A16 5G has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.