Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s, having a score of 81.3 against 77. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than Galaxy A20s, but LG managed to build it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than Galaxy A20s, because it has a larger aperture for better low light captures, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video definition and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A20s has superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.