Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21, having an 81.3 score against 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ is an much older cellphone than Galaxy A21, but it's a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a much better count of pixels per screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A21 has better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have a 16 MP resolution back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture and a way higher (4K) video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A21, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.