Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 77.7. The LG V35 ThinQ body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, although it was released 2 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen density and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A21s, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A21s features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A21s shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.