Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Galaxy A22 5G is a newer cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.