Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, having an 81.3 score against 79.9. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is lighter and thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a display that's very similar to the display in LG V35 ThinQ, because although the Galaxy A25 5G has a way lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a way lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit more memory for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.