Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 82.9 against 81.3. The Galaxy A34 is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner phone than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a really longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality and a camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.