Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 81.3 against 79.4. The LG V35 ThinQ is an much older phone than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is notably lighter and just a little thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.