Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-04-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A40's score of 79.6. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older and heavier than the Galaxy A40, it's design is still a bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A40, because it has a quite higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 6% bigger battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.