Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 81.7 score against 81.3. Galaxy A41's body is newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features a bit longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.