Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 81.3. Galaxy A50s's design is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's a little thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The LG V35 ThinQ features slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.