Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy A52 design is extremely newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixel density. The Galaxy A52 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.