Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a 91.3 score against 81.3. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is way newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.