Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 91.1 against 81.3. The Galaxy A52s is a noticeably newer cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size. Galaxy A52s counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.