Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy A6, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a way greater screen density.
LG V35 ThinQ features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light images.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.