Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 87.5 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a newer device than LG V35 ThinQ, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher display density.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 features a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy A71, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.