Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-01-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), having an 81.3 score against 79.2. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), although both were only released 5 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a little bit bigger display, a quite better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 10% larger battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.