Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 85.2 against 81.3. Even being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also a just a bit thicker and heavier phone. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a way better 24 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a little better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3800mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.