Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C5, getting an 81.3 score against 76.4. The LG V35 ThinQ design is much newer than Samsung Galaxy C5's, although it is just a bit heavier and thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a larger display and more pixels per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has a 27% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.