Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy C7's 77.7 general score. Although LG V35 ThinQ is a little thicker than the Galaxy C7, it's just a little lighter and also incredibly newer. The LG V35 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and a way better (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy C7 features a battery performance that's very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.