Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 88.1 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a much newer device than LG V35 ThinQ, although it is heavier and thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger number of cores (and faster).
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixels density. Galaxy F62 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 112% more battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.