Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 97.6 against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's also extremely heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.