Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's overall score of 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ's body is newer, lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a quite larger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixel amount per display inch. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light situations, a lot higher video quality and a better resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy J7 Max's battery lifetime is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.