Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-06-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy J8, having an 81.3 score against 76.7. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ and the Galaxy J8 were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG V35 ThinQ is lighter and a little thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better looking display than Galaxy J8, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much greater screen pixel density. The LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light images.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy J8, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy J8 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.