Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | PLS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M12, having an 81.3 score against 80. LG V35 ThinQ is an way older phone than the Samsung Galaxy M12, but LG made it noticeably lighter and much thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and much more pixels per display inch. The LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M12 has a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy M12 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.