Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-07-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M13, with a score of 81.3 against 81.1. The LG V35 ThinQ body is lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy M13, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a bit faster processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M13, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M13, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M13 features a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.