Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy M20, even though both were released only a couple months apart. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per display inch. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, a lot higher video definition, a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a more mega-pixels back camera. The Galaxy M20 features a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.