Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. Even though Galaxy M30 is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it is just a bit heavier and thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, a more megapixels camera in the back, a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a much better (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.