Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-06-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a overall score of 85 against 81.3. The Galaxy M40 is a newer device than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Galaxy M40. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher display density. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M40 has a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy M40 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M40 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.