Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a general score of 87.7 against 81.3. The Galaxy M51 design is newer, but notably heavier and a lot thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.