Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a 90.8 score against 81.3. The Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer phone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos and a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.