Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.2. LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer phone, and it is also thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy Note 3. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, much lesser pixels per screen inch and a little smaller display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photography.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Galaxy Note 3, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.