Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy Note 5. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a bit more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little less pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note 5's camera is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, because although the Galaxy Note 5 has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 16 megapixels resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.