Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is newer, but a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note10 counts with a processor that's just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, and although the Galaxy Note10 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 captures slightly better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a larger back camera sensor.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.