Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Although Galaxy Note10 Lite is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, a lower (4K) video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.