Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 80.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a much newer phone, and it's also a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note5. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Galaxy Note5, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note5's camera is just as good as the camera in LG V35 ThinQ, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.