Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, getting an 81.3 score against 76.9. Even though LG V35 ThinQ and the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime were only released 5 months apart, LG V35 ThinQ is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a greater display density and a little bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a camera with a higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy On7 Prime feature extremely similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.